编码ECS-3525-120-B-TR超小型SMD振荡器是高密度应用的理想选择，When the discussion of oscillators comes up, the same question will arise. What is the choice for performance in critical applications, MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) or quartz-based oscillators? MEMS-based oscillators have been available on the market since 2005. In the last 15+ years, a handful of companies have developed MEMS-based oscillators. Today, only a few remain and the leading MEMS-based oscillator manufacturer accounts for around 1% of the total timing market. Many frequency control manufacturers private label from both companies, with the exception of ECS who does not see any value in the practice.

When selecting the oscillator for your electronic devices or communications equipment, some of the timing considerations you need to think about are: system performance, system clocking, signal quality and reference signal sources. These are the critical parameters that will decide the performance level of your product.

You may have seen another video from a MEMS manufacturer comparing MEMS oscillators to stand alone quartz crystals. It is proven that any oscillator be it quartz, SAW, ceramic, or MEMS will always outperform any standalone resonator. So, a comparison of an oscillator to a crystal is not a true test of the oscillator’s performance. In this side by side comparison, we will look at and directly compare a quartz-based oscillator with a MEMS oscillator.

当讨论振荡器时，会出现同样的问题。关键应用、MEMS（微机电系统）或石英晶体振荡器的性能选择是什么？自 2005 年以来，基于 MEMS 的振荡器已经上市。在过去 15 年多的时间里，少数公司开发了基于 MEMS 的振荡器。如今，只剩下少数几家，领先的基于 MEMS 的振荡器制造商约占整个时钟市场的 1%。两家公司的许多频率控制制造商都是自有品牌，但 ECS 除外，ECS 在实践中没有任何价值。

在为您的电子设备或通信设备选择振荡器时，您需要考虑的一些时序因素包括：系统性能、系统时钟、信号质量和参考信号源。这些是决定产品性能水平的关键参数。

您可能已经看过来自 MEMS 制造商的另一个视频，美国ECS晶振将 MEMS 振荡器与独立的石英晶体进行了比较。事实证明，任何振荡器，无论是石英、SAW、陶瓷还是 MEMS，都将始终胜过任何独立的谐振器。因此，振荡器与晶体的比较并不是对振荡器性能的真正测试。在此并排比较中，我们将查看并直接比较基于石英的振荡器和 MEMS 振荡器。